Best viewed in Post Order

Sunday, 19 May 2013

Common Purpose And Their Complicity


WHAT IS THE TRUTH ABOUT Common Purpose: Registered Charity #1023384?
In criminal law, the doctrine of common purpose, common design or joint enterprise refers to the situation where two or more people embark on a project with a common purpose that results in the commission of a crime. In biology, a slime mould is not a single animal, but a colony of individual and independent organisms working toward a Common Purpose.
Common Purpose (the “Charity”) was founded in 1989 by Julia Middleton, a leadership expert and accomplished pubic speaker, neurolinguistic expert, propagandist and author. Its stated purpose is to bring together influential people from industry, Government, health and education, with operations centres in France, Germany, Ghana, Hungary, India, Ireland, Netherlands, South Africa, Sweden, Turkey, as well as the UK, to steer policy towards a common goal. What that goal is, only Common Purpose graduates know, because every one of their courses and meetings are held in secret. What we do know about them is that they are so secretive they will make unfounded and extrajurisdictional copyright claims against even the use of their name on any website that dares to belittle them.
Now, the problem (or one of the problems I have with them), is that since a charity cannot by law work to political ends (ie to directly influence public policy), then the claim by Julia Middleton and the maintenance of that claim by anybody associated with Common Purpose is fraudulent. This is why:
Common Purpose instructs its “pupils” (I can think of no better word… Padewans?) in how to operate outside their circle of authority. This, in a public sector position such as High Executive Officer of the Metropolitan Police (Ms. Kreffer?), or Children’s Minister (Yes, Ms. Harman and Mr. Balls, I’m referring to YOU), or the Operations Director of Thames Water (Mr. Holland?) is illegal. It introduces something called “Conflict of interest” which the second you start operating outside your circle of authority, is the first thing you come across. When the former Legal Officer of a civil liberties group with known ties to pedophiles and pedophile liberty groups then goes on to become Blair’s and Brown’s poster-child for the Social Care Generation, am I the only one who starts to get a warm fuzzy feeling of dread?
Now, not knowing a: when Ms. Harman became a Common Purpose Graduate or b: what she was told there, we can only guess at what actually happened, but with her CV, I do and I suggest anybody reading this would also, assume the worst: what Harman started, Balls and his successors will finish and push through even more legislation to further drive a wedge through families, parting parents with their children whether they deserve it or not (that point is immaterial to this discussion so we WILL NOT GO THERE) and open the door for pedophiles to adopt, abuse, murder and peddle our kids like sex toys – because that’s what they will be reduced to. We know when Mr. Balls attended, the House has the invoice. They won’t show it though, they don’t want to disclose how much Taxpayer’s (ie YOURS and MINE) money was used to send him on one of these secret courses, even though that money was used fraudulently as it is ONLY supposed to be used for OFFICIAL BUSINESS. Balls attended CP in a private capacity, like everyone else who attends has to – to maintain the front. Someone got caught out, didn’t they?
The other main problem is the outset lie of Common Purpose UK. To borrow from their own website under Fair Use Clauses of Copyright statutes: “The charitable objective of Common Purpose is the advancement of education for the public benefit.”
Oh, really? I see hardly 1% of their total membership being in the education field. What I see are Government ministers, company directors, high-ranking police officers, strategic military planning operators, bankers, doctors, clerics, utility company managers… pretty much every walk of public and private industry represented by directors, chief executives, HR directors, finance directors, senior partners, chief constables, CEO’s and chairmen; surely people who don’t need educating?
Ask yourself this: what, if any, extra training or steerage could these people possibly need or want?
Then answer: For Common Purpose, as the name suggests, the steerage is for corporate, political and financial policy change. The reason we are a bankrupt country is because of groups like this making it so.
The reason we are a terrified and paranoid country is groups like this making it so. The reason kneejerk statutes are passed ever restricting our very liberties is through groups like Common Purpose making it so. They’re not doing it for the good of the Public, they’re doing it for the good of themselves. We are cattle, good for whatever they can gouge out of us through our pockets or out of our bellies. If they can’t deprive us of our possessions because we have none they will literally take their forty pounds of flesh in our children.
My own conclusion and uninformed opinion (because CP will not tell us what they are about, they certainly are not a legitimate charity): CP are a front company for a larger, more insidious group of people (let’s call them a shadow government because that’s the pattern of behaviour) intent on creating a superstate with a single fiat currency, a single set of statutes, no common law, one court, and no tolerance for dissent.
I will not refer to them as classic Nazis. At least the Hitlerite Nazi party were up front and open and honest about their intentions! These Marxists operate in secret and are very paranoid about their secrecy.
So paranoid they have already started, with the Children Act 1989 as a notable example, to insert secrecy clauses into Statute. People have gone to jail without trial for breaking that one. I shit ye not. Harriet Harman (minister of state, Department of constitutional affairs, she’s now where she needs to be to push through the pedophile liberty thing she started in 1976!) said in Parliament in 2009 “Last year something like 200 people were sent to prison by the family courts, which happens in complete privacy and secrecy.” Go on, check it up on Hansard, it’s a matter of public record. This woman does not know how many people she has sent to prison on bogus charges and without due process! These people disappear into the prison system as easily as their children disappeared into the care system!
Did I tell you, the only thing these people did was to shout a bit too loudly at the judges and the family court system for being a bunch of corrupt pedophiles? 

No comments:

Post a Comment