Sunday, 19 May 2013
Dealing With What's Coming; or, How To See Them Coming
Frontline
Social Workers
These people are often the first point
of contact between parents and the Family Court system.
These people may or may not be
“qualified” in social care, they may or may not be registered in the GSCC
register (now subsumed into the Health Professionals council with no obvious
complaints process as the GSCC had). If they’re not registered, they’re
breaking the law by pretending they’re something they’re not. If they are and
pretend they’re not social workers, they are again breaking the law.
It is the job of these people not to protect children’s interests, but to
protect their own. To do this they need low-risk cases (low-income families,
those who are pretty much off the grid, fall into postal codes where the
general credit rating is far below the national average – these are families
who cannot afford to employ their own solicitors) where they first assess the
parents in what they consider friendly surroundings through people that aren’t
social workers – often people with degrees or training in psychology – such as
schoolteachers, community workers, home help... These people pick out the
smallest foibles in the parents (including their distant past history) and use
these to help SS build their case against the parents.
At this point, when the SS believe they
have the beginnings of a case, the threats start. They use their perceived
powers of persuasion to coerce the parents into signing “contract agreements[1]”
which aren’t worth the paper they’re written on, to get them to attend
parenting and anger management classes, by which they further build their case
that one or both parents aren’t quite up to the task of bringing up children in
the “normal” sense of the term.
These threats to remove the children
because of some perceived threat of abuse are made in the presence of the
children, who’s minds the SS are already starting to poison.
It is important to note, that even
though one or both parents may be cooperating fully with SS, their attendance
at these classes and group therapy sessions is seen as SS as signs of a guilty
conscience. Further building on their case.
Those parents who do not cooperate are
seen as mentally ill (those who throw abuse at SS operatives), or obstructive
for the sake of being obstructive.
The SS may decide to make a case of
immediate peril in these cases, and have the children removed on an Emergency
Protection Order. If they even bother with the paperwork.
During meetings with SS, which are
often interagency meetings where they seem to go over minutiae from previous
meetings, they will sometimes ask direct questions of the parents which are
designed to trip the parents up.
Such a question may take the form “Have
you stopped beating your wife?” which as given is an obvious trip-up. It is,
therefore, absolutely vital that you take an audio recorder (best bet is an mp3
player with full memory capacity and a fresh battery) and record the entire
meeting from the second you step through the car park to the second you step
off.
When you get home with the recording,
take a full transcript of the meeting, who said what and when, etc., and file
both for later use in court.
You do not have to warn the meeting
that they’re being recorded, in fact it’s best you don’t warn them at any
point.
Anything they say in those meetings can
legally be used as transcribed in court as evidence should they perjure
themselves (and they will!).
Also, do not give copies of these
recordings to anybody involved in the case, least of all any Family Panel or
CLA solicitor, as they can and do forward such information to SS who will use
such recordings to demonstrate your “mental instability and further evidence
that you are incapable as a parent”.
Social workers aren’t trained to be
cold and unfeeling, yet that’s exactly what they are.
The fact is that they were never shown
love as children therefore they think that it’s abnormal and wrong for anyone
to show affection for anyone else.
Just the sort of fodder for building SS
robots.
The psychosis harvested after years of
sowing hatred, rejection, emotional neglect and no hugs carries through
adulthood in these baby snatchers.
They show no emotion because they are
incapable of it.
They show no love or affection because
they are afraid of it.
Don’t hate them for what they are, pity
them for what they have become.
They want you to hate them, that’s
their “justification” for what they do.
They can’t stand pity because that’s an
emotion and they don’t know how to handle it.
Professional
Losers
ANY lawyer who works under the Legal
Aid Scheme (now known as Community Legal Advice, and administered by the Legal
Services Commission) is known throughout the legal industry as a “Professional
Loser” for a very good reason. CLA claimants who employ solicitors to fight
their case basically greenlight payments from the CLA Fund to their solicitor,
which the solicitor or their firm invoices at the conclusion of the case. These
solicitors are not paid by performance (ie they don’t get paid more for winning
your case), they’re paid a flat rate, more often than not per day or per half
day. What this means in practice, is that they have no incentive to work on
your case beyond the illusion that they’re actually doing something. Which is
usually evidenced by nothing more than a fat stack of academic research barely
relevant to your case.
What, you thought that five thousand
sheets and a big fat briefcase was all just for you?
Family Panel solicitors are those who
have special training above and beyond normal criminal or civil law. These
individuals are experts at misleading their clients, particularly when it comes
to constructing their case documentation, employing specialist witnesses (which
are selected by the SS lawyers and CAFCASS to further bolster their case), and
cross examinations in court. Certainly, all the right questions may be asked,
but in such a way as to not help your case at all. Most importantly, these
individuals who are meant to fighting in your corner do the most damage to your
case by advising you not to try calling your own specialist witnesses, your own
children, your extended family, character witnesses, or witnesses to events –
these would “harm your case[2]”.
If anything, if anyone recommends you
take legal advice, the best thing to do would be to go do your own research.
Find out about the Human Rights Acts of the UK and the Conventions on Human
Rights of Europe, and the UN Convention on Human Rights, the Children Act of
1989 (and as amended), and the Offences Against The Person Act 1861.
CAFCASS: the
Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service
These people are invariably
degree-qualified and registered social workers. This is, in fact, a
prerequisite qualification for employment by CAFCASS.
They do not, as much as they may
protest to the contrary, act in the best interests and according to the
feelings and wishes of your children. They work to the same agenda as Social
Services. That is, they find an easy mark and move in for the kill. It is usually
the same CAFCASS operative who sits through the entire case, as opposed to SS
staff who seem to go through a six week turnaround.
CAFCASS are not only employed as
consultants by the Courts, they also take instruction from the Family Panel
solicitors and from the social workers assigned to your case. This is never a
good thing. They also instruct their own solicitors who claim to speak on
behalf of your children, but this is untrue: they actually go on record as
representing CAFCASS.
To help build their case, CAFCASS spend
no more than four hours in total with your children and ask them about the
negative aspects of their home lives (eg do your parents shout at you, hit you,
deprive you, ever say no to you, etc), and use the noninformation they gather
to build the emotional harm side of the case against you. It is this part of
the case which SS most rely on, so if CAFCASS insist that they speak to your
children on a one-to-one basis, tell them to get a court order and have someone
on your side (not a solicitor!) attend all meetings between your children and
CAFCASS, and most importantly of all, have a video camera handy to record these
sessions. Since CAFCASS meetings are invariably conducted in home surroundings,
you have the right to do this, so do not allow anyone to tell you otherwise or
force you to turn off the camera.
The following is confirmed by
implication of responses given by CAFCASS in a Freedom of Information request
made in 2010:
CAFCASS Guardian ad Litem and/or
representative solicitors instruct or otherwise coerce expert witnesses acting
on instruction from all parties, over what to write in their reports to the
Family Courts.
CAFCASS Guardian ad Litem wilfully
misrepresents either by policy or by choice, the wishes and feelings of the
minors whom she is charged to represent.
CAFCASS’ unstated policy by formative
and ongoing doctrine is in line with CORAM’s stated goal to reap profit by way
of removing minors unlawfully from their natural parents and placing them with
those wholly unsuited to raising children in any sort of environment.
CAFCASS’ unstated policy by formative
and ongoing doctrine is to commit serial perjury to meet the goal as stated in
the previous point.
CAFCASS’ normal operating procedure, in
collusion with Local Authorities and Family Panel specialist legal
practitioners, is in line with Government stated policy to reach targets not to
protect children as is the public face of the organisation, but to create and
maintain profit at zero-return cost to every single Council Tax payer in the
country and the psychological and physical cost to every parent and minor they
succeed in separating.
CAFCASS’ operations are not in line
with normal advocacy procedures of an ostensibly nonprofit-making advocacy
service for children, they are more in line with a profit-making service
industry at the beckon call of Local Authorities under a private agreement to
accelerate the process of removal for financial gain.
Expert
Witnesses
These individuals are employed by the
Family Court and instructed by the Local Authorities, the solicitors and the
barristers.
They are usually educational
psychologists, often members of church groups.
This creates a huge dilemma, given that
their “scientific” conclusions are swayed by religious dogma, and a huge
conflict of interest given that at £500 per page of report, there is a LOT of
money to be made in telling the court exactly what they want to hear – that the
parents are paranoid, hypervigilant, narcissistic, and/or have any number of
previously undiagnosed mental disorders – including but not limited to
factitious illness or injury disorder (FII), AKA Muchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy
(MSBP), which has in all other legal circles, been completely debunked as a
valid diagnosis in cases where children are injured or suffer from congenital
illnesses that manifest symptoms similar to eg antifreeze poisoning.
It is these reports that Local
Authorities also use later on to base their completely unqualified decisions to
change the regimes of medication to the children (ie taking ADHD sufferers cold
turkey off of Class A psychotropics, blaming the parents for the upbringing
that caused the condition in the first place, or have prescribed tranquilisers
without consideration of possible counterindications via other conditions such
as Type II diabetes – both hold potentially fatal consequences).
In the court, there is usually only one
expert witness called, and he would be as described. The parents will be told
by their own solicitor that they would not be allowed to call their own expert
(usual excuse is that it would cost too much), although if you can find one in
family or close friend who would be willing to speak for you out of sheer
good-heartedness, then go for it.
The solicitor, CAFCASS and even the
judge will try and insist that you do not call your own witnesses, claiming
that it will only harm your case; this is so much bull I cannot even begin to
describe.
Call EVERYONE, make sure YOU get to
cross-examine them all, even the Local Authority’s witnesses (including the
Social workers), yourself.
Take off the gloves while you do it,
they aren’t going to be polite to you, so return the favour.
As the assessment goes, if you have
access to any kind of video or audio recording equipment – USE IT. DO NOT let ANYONE bully you into turning it off, under ANY
circumstances.
If they tell you to turn it off while
the camera’s rolling, ask them – on camera – what they’re afraid of saying. If
they insist, tell them the meeting’s over and show them the door. DO NOT stop the recorder until they
have departed your property completely.
Make raw copies of ALL recordings
immediately and store the master recordings in another building entirely (a
relative’s house or a secure lockup).
Speaking of recordings, some visitors
will want to take photographs of your home. DO NOT allow this! Photographs CAN
and DO lie, particularly if they have been doctored.
Anyone who knows how to use the Redeye
function in Photoshop will tell you, it is insanely easy to manipulate
photographs. For example, it takes about two minutes to add detritus to a shot
of a kitchen floor, another minute to add a layer of dust to a TV screen, and
it’s a cut&paste operation to add cat crap pretty much anywhere. Most of
the time though, it doesn’t even require this level of sophistication to fool a
judge – they’ll usually accept the claim by a Social Worker that a photograph
taken in the dead of night with the flash as the only source of light of a
garden toy like a swing or slide on a bed of hardfrosted mud was actually taken
on a summer evening.
Actually having the opportunity to
point out to the judge something a five year old would notice, and show the SW
to be the liars they are, is pretty satisfying. Showing them to be above such
things as trespass laws is also very satisfying.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment