The Great PTSD Lie

The condition often referred to as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, when applied to parents of children abducted into State custody for fostering or adoption, is a misapplication of words.

It should more properly be referred to as Post Traumatic Stress INJURY.

This is an INJURY inflicted by the State on families, for no baser reason than to make as much MONEY as possible through the selling and trafficking of the children.

This INJURY is inflicted on a continuous basis on the parents and on the children in the enforcement of separation by the State, in what can only be described as TORTURE, to two ends:

1. to make the children pliable so they can be trafficked. Problem children are routinely administered with chemical coshes.

2. to render the parents unable to mount a legal counterattack to the criminal activity of the State, by virtue of the fact that they have implanted into the public conscious the idea that PTSD is a mental disorder, a disease of the mind - when in fact it is a result of a malicious action by external influences. The fact that Statute prevents those of “unsound mind” from mounting proper legal challenges, makes it a simple task for the State to invariably find in favour of Local Authorities in situations where parents file civil actions against them for vicarious child abuse. This, coupled with the fact that mere suggestion of mental illness in Family Proceedings[1] is enough to entirely discredit parent litigators, is why no civil action initiated by a parent against a Local Authority has ever succeeded.

The ONLY cure for PTSI is the complete rectification of the influence that is causing the injury. This influence is best described as the deliberate alienation by segregation, of the children from the parents.

---

[1] Perhaps not surprisingly, it requires the testimony of only a single individual, comically referred to as an “expert witness”, in Family Proceedings, to result in the sectioning of an individual under the Mental Health Act, to have them committed to jail or to have some sort of restraining order made against them to prevent them from contacting their own children or in some cases, their own spouse. Do not be too surprised, though, as it is shown time and again in this book that Family Proceedings operate outside the Law; hence, the fact that the testimony of a single person is not enough to lawfully find guilt under Magna Carta does not worry them a bit because they’ll do it anyway.