Foreword

Following my five year (and counting) struggle with the Family Legal System in England, during which time I’ve endured the abduction of my own children by the State, death threats by agents of State as well as individuals, actual attempts on my life, attempts to deprive me of my liberty, attempts to discredit me by defamation, slander and libel, and a swathe of other and varied mistreatments, I think it’s about time I shared some of what I’ve learned.

One thing I have learned in that time is that the Family Legal System in England is broken. It is broken beyond the ability to repair what is there, and it’s little to do with the way it is constructed (with some shocking exceptions which I’ll go into later). It is a lot to do with the way it is implemented, which unfortunately for anyone who has had thus far, the fortune not to have become embroiled in it, is so mired in secrecy as to make the Government’s military intelligence community envious, with the result being that nobody outside the system knows even a hint of what goes on notwithstanding the dribblings of press leakage.

My mission, should I choose to accept it (and I do), is to expose the inner workings of this system as far as I understand it and to offer some technique in how to defeat it using their own rules (by which they expect us to act) against them. Read: beat them down with their own stick.

When the Berlin wall came down in 1989 it was revealed that the Stasi were using the forced adoption of children in order to intimidate and control parents in such a way they would conform to the State view.

Like the UK today, anyone making a complaint against the NHS, Local Authority, Social Services, Cafcass, or any state body, can and are then falsely accused of child care issues that just do not exist.

It is both used as a defense to complaint/litigation, often to cover up serious or clinically revealing medical negligence incidents.

Effectively not unlike the days of the Stasi behind the Berlin wall, we seem to have a growing situation of control of citizens by threatening their families children, with all false reporting being done by making organizations automatically responsible for reporting observations while having contact with families.

This has opened the door for all citizens to be falsely accused of child care issues if for any reason they disagree with state bodies, NHS Trusts and many charitable organizations including the RSPCA which has featured in some cases.

The question is did we win the cold war or did we lose it by the wall coming down?

Then being infiltrated by citizens who shared the Stasi ideals who then got into positions of influence and gradually over the past 21 years changed our system in the direction of the Stasi policed system.

The Stasi policed system relied on keeping privileged citizens in the pay of the State as snoopers and reporters of false events to persecute innocent families by the forced adoption of their children or the threat of the same in order to ensure their silence as to state corruption and human rights violations.

Secrecy and threats of detainment or worse was what silenced citizens on the other side of the wall throughout the years.

It is strange that 11 years after the wall came down in the year 2000 the same forced adoption was introduced by Tony Blair with reward grant targets for local authorities who forcibly adopted sufficient children to hit their targets.

Since then thousands of children have been damaged by forced adoption from perfectly good and caring parents based on the local authorities adoption panels decision that the long term welfare of the child is to be met by forced adoption.

This is a paramount decision that the court cannot overrule at application for placement stage as the court is ruled by the same measure being paramount to place the child.

Sadly although the judiciary do not speak out fully and reveal this, we do indeed, like the Stasi days of the East, have a situation where Local Authorities are effectively Judge, Jury and executioner over whether a child is forcibly adopted, because you cannot make an appeal once a child has been placed for adoption unless that child is not adopted for 12 months (most are).

So who needs the Stasi when we have the SS as Judge, Jury and executioner anyway?

By the senior judiciaries published comments regarding SS disgraceful unethical activity in child care cases, the Stasi have indeed found a new home for their intimidation by the forced adoption of children from perfectly innocent families.

THE UK.

Perhaps if the Judiciary were given back total control over decisions then more ethical decisions would be made that are truly in the interests of children, instead of being in the interests of the State local authorities.

Then it might be possible for parents to challenge the” long term welfare of the child” decision by approaching the Judge with a private “long term welfare of the child” assessment challenging the State local authority adoption panel decision.

At present there is no known mechanism in law that would be effective in allowing parents and children an independent assessment and an opportunity to challenge the Local Authorities paramount adoption panel decision with that assessment.

This is why children of innocent parents are forcibly adopted even though the parents have done no wrong.

Citations given in footnotes/links through this site are neutral citations that yield results on Google, BAILII (the Britain And Ireland Legal Information Institute) and other legal search engines.

This website will self-destruct in five seconds.

James-Ross Moore, Esq., AKA ihtoit